… is the correct title for the current (Spring 2016) special issue of English in Education. In producing the print edition, the publishers accidentally transposed the title Assessment and Learning from the proposed 2017 special issue. The online version has the correct title, and print subscribers will receive a postal note from the publishers.
So how does the special issue view the current politics of English? In his editorial, Ken Jones writes:
The articles in this special issue register the effects of … the ways in which English, through a thirty-year process of cumulative change, has come to be regulated and redefined. They examine some of the intellectual justifications put forward by advocates of change. They track its effects on teachers’ sense of the possibilities of English. Without hyperbole, they consider alternatives.
Simon Gibbons’ article focuses on the ways in which teachers have internalised the requirements of policy in their own sense of what it means to be a good English teacher. Andrew McCallum studies the teaching of English in a state secondary school and a private school. He argues that, in the first school, where creativity is seen not as integral to English but as conditional upon the prior mastery of something uncreative, a skills focused curriculum produces a drastic narrowing of the learning experience. This experience is captured by Michael Rosen in his poem ‘Bear Grylls’, which the author has allowed us to reprint for the special issue from his latest collection.
Drawing on a comparative study of teaching Romen and Juliet in London and Palestine, Monica Brady and John Yandell insist that ‘classrooms are places where meanings are made, not merely transmitted’. In similar vein, Karen Daniels, in her article on Early Years education, argues that English – or ‘literacy’ – is a site where students develop ‘repertoires for meaning-making’. These micro-practices of English teaching are not insulated from the political, as they are enabled and constrained by the wider, ‘macro’ social practices of policy-makers and social movements. Howard Ryan and Debra Goodman consider these in their account of the ‘whole language’ movement in the United States. As Ken Jones concludes, to make significant changes to the present state of English requires looking beyond the micro-politics of the classroom.